/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10937937

>buy some testing kit

Like what? Ehrlich isn't enough as it only tests for the presence of indoles. Sure it will deter research chems but what about smarter asshats? In >>10936758 I elaborate how easy that could be to fool. Surely there is a better approach to be sure you have LSD. The only specific character unique to LSD I can think of is Piezoluminescence:

"In the folk-literature surrounding psychedelic production, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT, and LSD have been reported to exhibit piezoluminescence. As specifically noted in the book Acid Dreams, it is stated that Augustus Owsley Stansley III, one of the most prolific producers of LSD in the 1960s, observed piezoluminescence in the compound's purest form, which observation is confirmed by Alexander Shulgin: "A totally pure salt, when dry and when shaken in the dark, will emit small flashes of white light."

What if you took 3 tabs (300 mcg, nearly 1/3 of a mg) and extracted them with high proof ethanol, evaporated it in a small dish, scraped up remains, put it in a small glass vial, and shook it hard in the dark? If it emits flashes it's legit...Any other ideas besides "lol, hope you don't die test monkey brainlet"?

>>10875099
nice dubs

>>10874995
https://wiki.dmt-nexus.me/Kash%27s_Advanced_LSA_Extraction