/sci/ - Science & Math

>scientifically speaking of "feelings/emotions"
>no one mentions two hundred years of experimental psychology and neuroscience research
>derive debate on atheism

What kind of ignorants are wasting their time on /sci/ these days...?

>>4956961

Shit!
Wrong picture.
Should I make another thread?

shit i forgot to actually ask the question explicitly, sorry cross-board copypaste error.
>what is the name of a. and b.?

>>4577780
Ok, I will be killing myself now

>>4559331
I do you one better:
We had to do an exercise in physicsclass and before we did it we had to make an guess. I saw that the answer was between 21 and 22 so I said 21.5.

Moron deduced a point because 21.5 was the actual answer and I could never have guessed that beforehand.

>>4494030
you're right my fyucking bad
its fucking ammonia and bleach you faggasses
>mfw my mistake

>>4478700
>>4478700
>He doesn't know that water is polarised anyway and is affected by magnets..

>>4448999
>doesn't understand something
>doesn't ask for clarification

>>4435673
/sci/ is not your elementary education. go back to school.

>Does that mean it will be more effective at cooling?
yes it means it will be more effective at cooling.
>will it evaporate faster?
Yes it will evaporate faster (think hand sanitizer idiot)

cannot tell if trolling or just plain fucking idiot.

> to make like robot bodies for people in the future

hey guys,
been cruising through this domain/range chapter pretty smoothly, but i've come to a standstill.

I'm really confused regarding these certain questions about finding the domain and range.
if you could have a go i'd really appreciate it.

also what does the graph look like?

http://flockdraw.com/gallery/view/1109469

>>4272480

>>4200544
>mfw

>>4196272
>size of photon
>size of a massless particle
>mfw

>>3952439

>>3711649

>Note to self: don't mention anything on /sci/ above a high school level

Oh fuck, not again...

>modern man
>this genius thinks we came from a monkey

>this thread

>>3552144
The feasibility of this in this at present day is just too low. But keep dreaming, we need dreamers.

Hello guys!
I'm trying to figure out something but I can't conclude, would you be kind enough to give me a hint or to help me?

There's the problem: we define <span class="math"> x_n[/spoiler]as the unique positive solution of <span class="math">x^n+x=1[/spoiler]
I was asked to show that<span class="math"> x_n \rightarrow 1[/spoiler] , which is done.
Then I want to find an equivalent of <span class="math">\epsilon=1-x_n [/spoiler]
So I started like this (I'll write <span class="math">x[/spoiler] instead of <span class="math">x_n[/spoiler])
<span class="math">x^n=1-x[/spoiler]
=> <span class="math">n ln(x) = ln(1-x)[/spoiler]
=><span class="math">n= \frac{ln(1-x)}{ln(x)}= \frac{ln(1-x)}{ ln(1-(1-x))} [/spoiler]
so <span class="math">n \sim \frac{-ln(1-x)}{(1-x)} = \frac{ln(\frac{1}{\epsilon})}{\epsilon}[/spoiler]
Now, if I use sitrling's formula with Int(1/epsilon) (equivalent to 1/epsilon anyway), I end up with
ln( Int(1/epsilon) ! ) ~ n
Now how do I find the actual equivalent for epsilon? Am I even doing it right?
Thanks for any help you could provide me with!

>>3368992

>mfw he took it seriously
>/sci/ is full of retards

>>3359985

Please stop. You aren't making America look any better