/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15987739
its also not warming

>>15754780
The rise of humanity correlates with a reduction in overall global temperature, not an increase.

>>14740843
>Where?
>>14732020
citing an imgae that literally have never had its prediction came true has always got to be the most retarded proof ever.

>But that's wrong. Similar rates of warming in the past also coincide with mass extinctions. Must be a coincidence.
I just showed you an image compiled by one of the best source of climate information and your retarded response is simply no? How convenient.

>Unreliability warming is not nearly as extreme as current warming. How many times are you going to make this faulty comparison?
Yep you're now purely retarded, I'll post the image again. Look at the Cretaceous hot Greenhouse period. That's when fucking Neanderthals and homo sapiens thrived despite living a temperature that's magnitude more hotter than our current and future climate. Again putting a large gaping hole in your retarded narrative that it will lead to crippling human lives.

>Of what? You're saying climate change wasn't a factor when there was no extreme climate change.
You continuing top deny them doesn't make them non-existent as evident by your complete and lack of evidence to the contrary.

>How does it btfo anything I said? Use your words like a big boy. And you just dodged the part that proves I'm right.
And again, I accept your retarded concession because you literally are running out of argument now. Not only are you ignoring the last 300,000 year of human evolution and cause of mass extinction but you also think that some retarded image of a retarded prediction is some concrete evidence that we will be heading to a climate worse than what our forebearers have gone through which is evidently false.

>Incorrect. See >>14740553
Likewise, see>>14740651

>It's impossible to determine that from periods that didn't have extremely rapid warming.
See above. Again, you keep repeating it doesn't mean it's not real.

>How does this respond to what you quoted?
You tell me, you ask the retarded question in the 1st place