/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11868384
FUCKIN TENSORS, HOW DO THEY WORK?

>>9340769

>>9297364
Same tech we'd use to stop missiles, presumably, but miniaturized to minimize collateral damage.

>>9297377
Some sort of chaff was the first thing I thought of too because my experience with drones usually has focused on their buzzing and how it freaks me out a little.

EMP or a big ol' magnet might actually be the way to go though. There could be tech to focus magnets on specific targets that the military could develop. I don't know though because I don't know how they work...

Lasers are also a good option since they're the obvious tech being researched to intercept missiles. However, there would be too much collateral damage in a civilian setting, I would assume, more so than EMP/magnets. I much rather have my smartphone fried than be zapped by a magnets.


But really, if these drones are primarily going to be used to explode leftists, is developing countermeasures really that necessary? These are the real questions we need to be asking ourselves.

Who thought it would be ICP who summed up the beauty of nature and mysteries of science so perfectly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs

>>8361996
>there is no asteroid

There are a metric fuckton of asteroids out there m8.

>Will we get hit? I don't think the chances are any greater or less on those days than any other day.

Just reread that and let it sink in.

Anything is possible