/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10607407
>1. Global warming apologists use unscientific methods: "every scientist agrees on this" - first of all it is not a scientific argument; second - where have you seen ANY issue every scientist agreed on?

Hm im pretty sure all of them who aren't lobbiest payed to deny everything agree on the fundamental laws of thermodynamics, physics and chemistry all of which explain GW.

>Digging further into science I can see that EVERY field is corrupted.

Okay. So... do you want me to share emails of lobbiest people who have taken money from big oil to push the idea that there is no global warming? Politicians have done it as well. I encourage you to rly rethink what you are saying here. You are saying that scientific fields are all corrupted. How come world wide agencies from all across the world made their own models and got the same results? All corrupted? Tin foil hat?

Even Exxon got it kek but they covered it up.