/sci/ - Science & Math

>professor, do you have any peer review literature out?

>no, i could send you some technical references but you would not understand any of it.

what a joke.

>JEWUSH CONSPIRACYY

>>/x/

>>3965579

If your point is that governments enable large corporations to get bigger I'd agree with you. Getting rid of governments would go a long way towards evening out the playing field.

Collusion is impossible in a free market system, as all it takes is 1 greedy person for the whole thing to collapse. That's why you only see collusion in highly regulated industries and/or government granted monopolies/oligopolies/cartels.

>>3965582

So you are stupid and this is someone else's fault? That's what I'm getting out of part 2 here. I thought it was common knowledge that soap was the way to deal with gnats/fruit flies?

This also seems to undermine your initial point. Either the GREEDY CORPORASHUNS make up useless formulas to sell to DIMWITTED SHEEPLE or they use the cheaper tried n' true. Which are you arguing? First you argue bug spray is needlessly complicated when alcohol would work fine, now you are complaining about a different kind of bug spray being simple soap and water, which you don't like because you wanted a wunder formula full of complicated thingies. Which is it?