/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12630366
You're just making absurd leaps in logic; seeing increases in various health conditions and just assuming it is a result of vaccination without a shred of evidence. You need to demonstrate causality for your arguments to carry any weight. Did you even bother to read any of these studies or do you just blindly copy and paste them into every thread on this issue? The first link 404s so I'm going to assume no.
>US is 55th globally in infant mortality.
What's your point? Countries with the lowest levels of infant mortality have overwhelmingly better access to vaccination programmes
>Why Is Infant Mortality Higher in the United States Than in Europe?
The study draws absolutely no conclusions on the causes of the IDR differences between the USA and Europe other than to assert that much of the decline in infant mortality in the 1950 to 1990 period was due to improvement in NICU technology.
>As of 2011's data 43% of children in the US have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions. 54% if we include obesity
Again, what's your point? Nothing in the study you posted makes any reference to vaccination
>Rate of autism continues to rise. 1 in 59 males nationally.
Again, you're just observing an increase in autism diagnoses and just assuming it's linked to vaccines. Vaccination rates have remained relatively constant for decades now and yet autism cases have continued to increase. In the UK, vaccination rates dropped from ~90% to ~80% circa 2000-2010 due to the MMR scandal and yet autism cases continued to rise in that time. Find a study that shows a statistically significant rate of autism in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children.