/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15444893
>Current space elevator proposals
Now do it with a space plane meeting a Sky Hook at 100,000 feet. it's 1-10% of the cost of starship. You are strawmanning me. I already said I am not advocating for a elevator attached to the Earth's surface and that number is based off such a system.

Not to mention Start ship has failed to get to orbit and is year behind schedule. Starship also has huge issues with launch tempo which will bottle neck the lifting of raw mass off the crust of the Earth. You are 110% incorrect and make wild assumptions that the biggest scam artist of the 21st century, Musk, will follow through on any of his promises....you know like self driving cars.

Here watch this and educate yourself cultist.
https://youtu.be/WjMTitvc82E

>>15444897
That's what I thought cultist, go sit in the corner and wait for you WEF master Elon Musk to come so you can stroke his cock, all you're good for.