/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12002609
>the real line is clopen
I meant to say that it is not clopen in the long line which is the OBVIOUS relevant aspect of clopenness.

>why do you think you can define a set by calling it open?
I think I can begin a standard analysis by saying "Let THING be a Hausdorff space," pic related from my non-quick, long proof:
Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

>it needs to be defined before you can put a topology on it you retard
Hausdorff has already defined a Hausorff space, luckily for me.

>there is a definition of a point in math, an element of R^n
I can't use that definition because then I would be defining in a circle. Indeed, I don't even need to define points at all because it suffices to invoke a Hausdorff space. I only brought up the definition of points because I was facetiously inb4ing you.

>>12002609
You never defined the Latin alphabet in which you are crafting posts, and yet I am able to understand what you write. How is that, do you think?