[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15976673 [View]
File: 325 KB, 847x610, hubbard limits.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15976673

Is this a mistake? If f(x) = 0 on [-1, 0) U (0, 1] and f(x) = 1 for x=0, why would lim x ->0 not exist?

I assume this is a consequence of the books limit definition, which says x can equal x0. But doesn't this mean limits are only defined for points in the domain if the function is continuous at that point?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]