/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16197560
No. I said ""trained"", not "trained". And I use the term "relevant" loosely. It's "relevant" in a statistical/mathematical context. It's only "relevant" to the training data, or to producing examples that fit with the training data. There's more to reasoning than sharting out examples that superficially fit the data, with no reference to the underlying reality that generated the training data to begin with. The thing about language is that it's very imprecise, and yet people think it's precise and that they can "argue" by playing stupid little games with words. It leads to the kind of horribly retarded thinking you're exhibiting. There's really no cure, I suppose. Very concerning.

>>16184400
Well maybe I'm assuming it's flat and goes on forever, smarty pants.

>>16126499
>>16126500
/sci/ has the most irredeemable larping retards

>>16030214

>>15818569
Land bugs are yummy

>>15557040
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm yes indeed anon

>>15500462
based
fuck humies and fuck cars
forest is for birds and bears