/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15400808
Yet despite all that all my points stand, tourist town near by, turtles near by, other better options not pursued. All your typing means nothing as it seems his projections of launch tempo are impossible at Boca Chica and as you so admit that was the best choice. Lets assume you are right and I am wrong.

Boca Chica is as good as Space X can hope to get, ok well now we know that all that shit he promised is impossible. It will take maybe years to get Starship launching safely and likely 5-12 launches per year. That means what, 10 years to build and launch the Mars mission, at best?

From every angle you look at it this is bad news. best case they solve the issues in the next 6-12 months and get a second attempt. Then you are looking at Space X delivering on 10% of the projects they promised and the US government gets first dibs on all launch payload spots.

>I don't see why it couldn't work
Just what everyone wants to hear about the largest rocket in history. This is clown world ^2

>>15400821
asked and answered above by me

>>15400831
Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, hawaii, Open ocean launch from international waters.

If Boca Chica doesn't work the plan doesn't work, see above.

>>15400838
Take meds, you are a schizo on max
>>15400842
So your cope is Falcon works so stop picking on Starship? REALLY?!? KEK See above for rebuttals to all your points.

>>15400848
I saw video of Starship derbies falling on a tourist town with a pier and shops. Fuck you, take meds.