/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8720389
>I'm not even the guy you're responding your copy pasted arguments to moron.
Pathetic boy, I do not know who you are, nor do I care.
>Just here to point out what a shill you are. Same images every thread, same shitty arguments. You're so pathetic.
Damn you're easily triggered. Must be a SJW. I can't wait to trigger you over and over and over.
>Pro-tip, change your filenames, you're really starting to look desperate.

Pro-tip, when you resort to simply searching archives of Indonesian Checker Boards, You've lost. It demonstrates that you have no substantive counter argument to the data presented.

>>8663974
>>8663954
>This is hilarious, this is an exact, copy-pasted comment from a previous thread. My god that is pathetic. Do you keep a notepad open with all your shitty comments pasted there to just pull up the same old, tired shitty arguments again and again?

Ah your butthurt is tremendous. Truth spoken again is still truth. Must hurt a great deal.

>>8629867
>>8629804

Try again

Since you believe that skeptics of a big scientific theory are all conspiracy nuts, then this is what you would believe:

MAJORITY OF SCIENTISTS BELIEVE__________ SKEPTIC THEORY_____________ YOU
Ether theory of light__________________________ No ether _____________________There could only be no ether if there's a huge conspiracy
Continents are fixed__________________________ Continents drift________________ Continential drift can only be true if they're a huge conspiracy
Physics is deterministic_______________________ Quantum mechanics___________ Non-deterministic physics can only be true if there's a huge conspiracy
Phlogiston theory of Combustion________________ No phlogiston_________________ No phlogiston can only be true if there's a huge conspiracy
Time and space are fixed______________________ Relativity____________________ Fixed space and time can only be true if there's a huge conspiracy
Catastrophic AGW will kill us____________________ CO2 has a weak effect_________ CO2 Weak!!!??? Its a conspiracy theory

>>8600021
>Smoothing wouldn't make some part more extreme and others less extreme. Nice deflection dumbass.
You're the dumbass. I'm talking about the smoothness of the originally graphed data vs. The higher variability of the (less smoothed) overlaid data.

You really are an autist.

>>8579407
>what's next? modern radiometers allow for better spatial resolution than older one's?
So NASA developed a time machine to go back in time and re-measure old temperatures with new radiometers?

>>8567506
>>>/x/

>>8486017
Please don't post your chidlish roleplaying garbage on a science board then let us know what your ideal /sci/ should be like anyone here gives a fuck