/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16117998
>Definitions
>pi
>defined

>Dont worry, it works perfect in base-π.
>"itself" is the base
Which isn't a number.

>>15509545
>ontology
>nature of being

What part of "null/no quantification" did you not understand?

>i still don't know what "will of the elbow grease variety" is.
It exists as potential. It's not realized for your casual eyes to comprehend. It's the mind formulating the idea, the blueprint of what is to be. This shouldn't be hard to comprehend.

>>15483594
>And you are beyond saving if you believe this made up nonsense.
The "speed of light" is made up nonsense along with the majority of other theories revolving around the phenomena. No one has ever even seen "light", they see "illumination" which is just the effects of a perturbed medium. It's like calling waves of water in a pool something different than the water and then claiming the water doesn't exist when there is no waves splashing in it making it visible.

>>15468821
>When you ask why, you're implying why

>>15414448
>Vacuum is a lack
So it should "lack" the fucking light they allegedly claim is "in it" then? How do you refer to something/test something when it's defined using "lack"?

>>15340624
>It makes perfect sense, as you're in the center, mass is attracting you from all directions,
There's "0 gravity" so how can there be mass in the center given that the only causal link to gravity is mass itself?

>so the forces all cancel out.
So the earth is hollow...

>>14972893
>Nope. I am asking about your epistemology.
You want my thought process regarding a fantasy? I already laid it out pretty well in my previous posts. I don't believe in them, until proven true of course in which case they're no longer a fantasy now are they?

>On what basis do you claim it is fake?
"The lack of basis". As it "it has no foundation in reality". The claim it exists as far as I'm concerned is just shouting "Fire" in a crowded theater. Okay...so "where is the fire?" Where is this "corona virus"?

>>14955669
>this means there's now proof light travels

Nice, but still no. Also: "brighter" than which part? It's brighter despite 3 polarizing filters guiding/blocking the light as opposed to 2 which block it completely (which implies the way light "exists" doesn't even remotely have to do with "traveling" or "speed" because it couldn't be logically explained how these results occur). You can only explain it with the implication of a medium, a medium which can't possibly exist because the null result of a failed hypothesis "proved" otherwise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe

is dis real