/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11715648

Don't deny the truth anon. You know damn well there's no other explanation for uneducated men to completely over take educated men in partners in the span of three decades. Then proceed to maintain that lead afterwards.

>>11622615

>they have very high rates of that in academia and industry

Then why call them liars, cheaters and bugmen? What are the justifications for insulting them for being prevalent in academia and industry? Why acknowledge those high rates if you question the validity of their mark's behind it?

>east asian men are by far some of the lowest testosterone, most neotenous males on the planet

They've also created some of the most advanced and dexterous physical combat arts/ excercises globally despite their low testosterone. Why should they still be labeled as "weak"?

>average penis size is smaller, less muscle mass and height, etc

These are true, but these are not traits exclusive to them but simply more prevalent. And prevalence is simply a dice roll of how genes spread within a population from the past. Nothing is stopping these traits from changing in the future. So momentary penalization of these traits seem narrow minded and cheap shots to justify putting people down.