/sci/ - Science & Math

Why is quantum mechanics considered a legitimate science when it's 100% based on conjecture? It's going to be hilarious in 50 years when he look back and laugh at all the people who took that stuff seriously.

1.the physics rule reality we live in, are only physics that are possible
to exist. there can't be reality, where any other laws of physics could exist.
They are determined by logic, 1+1 can't equal anything else than exactly 2
2.reality that surrounds us is quatnum. therefore, it's not linear. the quatums
are next to each other. nothing is between nor beyond them.
3.man has free will. It is detemined partialy but not absolutely.

=> conclusion:
the number of possible scenarios of realities is finite.

=> if 1. is untrue, there is infinity number of possible realities, where universe
is not ruled by known to us laws of physics. the conclusion above would be then
only a subset of infinity possibilities however the subset would be still finite.

a proof to a conclusion: situation where you can make move a hand (it's simple
but shows my way of thinking): you can move it to left or right. you can move
it up and down. also you can move it in every direction of 360 degrees. degrees
can divide. if you divide number of degrees in half, you have already 720 possible
scenarios of this simple situation. numbers are infinite so you can divide infinite
number of times. assuming 1. you can't divide them infinitr times. Therefore,
number of possibilities is finite. and so is number of every other situation.

in my thinking might be a mistake in understanding of non linear nature of
quants. anyway, I'm looking for errors, mistakes in my thinking so I could
get closer to the truth. Also I don't assume that 1. 2. and 3. are true, they're
assumed true only for this conclusion.
what should I learn to have better understanding of stuff above?

discuss

Are the Many Worlds interpretation and the Copenhagen interpretation falsifiable?

Hey /sci/. Educate me on the wonder that is quantum physics using youtube. No conspiracy bullshit.

So, in understanding the lexicological algorithims, one must fully fathom the quantum nature of it's base theorem. Self-sufficiently speaking in lieu of vertical extrapolation, it's X value is equivalent to the Y in the 4th dimension. And thus in the present space time continuum. Unfortunately, eliminating the central base singularity of the tidal forces, direct proportional values alter the theoretical anomalies. As a result, a general misconception is brought into consideration illuminating the VY Canis Majoris in the Hawking ETA amongst other self-sustaining energy production giants. As a result, the Salarian Ilium is presently affected by various ultraluminious gamma-ray sources due to Kepplrian motion, one can deduce that reverberation mapping is proved to effect galaxies such as Seyfert, and minute quasars.

So.. All you need is an acceleration disk..

Give me all of your pdf/screenshots/infographics/etc in relations to Quantum Physics.

Hi /sci/entists. Is this video bullshit or is there a possibility of that being true?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCe2lXa_UqM

He claims to have found the way to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics by 1 year of study. He doesn't have a physics-related degree. He is extremely intelligent, has been one of the best WoW players in the world and is a top poker player, this is what I know about him.

So today I learnt about the Theory of Uncertainty (h.s physics).
"It basically fucked my mind over so hard.
The more I know about the motion of an object, the less I know about its position. The more I know about the position of an object, the less I know about its motion."

For a stationary object, you could be looking at it, but chances are it is not there, and can be somewhere else.

Seriously /sci/ ... wtf.

My mind has been fucked on to oblivion.

bump

/sci/ is moving fast.. all these fucking troll threads.