[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8017701 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 21 KB, 420x420, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8017701

>ChemE student
>did nothing but the absolute bare minimum last year
>never bought any textbooks or read them
>never went to the library to study
>still got 3.2 GPA
>friends get butthurt when they realise I got the same result for half the effort

>> No.8007333 [View]
File: 21 KB, 420x420, 1430750532799.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8007333

The brainlet paradox:
>"intelligence means nothing"
>"if you disagree with me, you are dumb"

>> No.8000797 [View]
File: 21 KB, 420x420, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8000797

Do tall people age faster or are they just more susceptible to age related diseases?

>> No.7997421 [View]
File: 21 KB, 420x420, 1448708003779.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7997421

>>7997367
>>7997377
>>7997381
>>7997390
Free will is already impossible on a logical level. No physics needed.

Proof:
If you have free will, I'll ask you to explain a decision procedure you consider to be "free".
Case 1: You can fully explain the decision procedure. Thus you have an algorithm to follow and thus your decision was not free.
Case 2: You cannot explain it. Thus you had no control over it.

>> No.7985336 [View]
File: 21 KB, 420x420, 1440770374084.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7985336

ITT: brainlets can't distinguish between an observation and a theory

OP is clearly right. This is why we need more philosophy in science.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]