/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7731402

A study from 1880 to 2005, showing a trend over 125 years, and you're worried about it missing the last 10, as if a trend that consistent and over that time scale would suddenly stop in that period. And, guess what? It didn't.

Source: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044022/meta

>>7730395

Yes, the most accurate, uncited temperature data that you just pulled out of your ass or from some random guy's blog. Here is the actual temperature record from 1979 to 2010, per Foster and Rahmstor 2011, a peer-reviewed article posted in an actual climate science journal, found here:

http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044022/meta

The .gif shows both raw data and the data adjusted to remove El Nino Souther Oscillation, random solar variance, and volcanic activity.

>>7730397
>>7730401

Wow, if you just choose the right specific coordinates on the Earth's surface, you can show whatever trend in temperature you want because you're showing local weather instead of regional climate, and any broader trends quickly become part of all whole bunch of noise. How fascinating.