/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11092350
(2/2)
You seek what you are absent of, whether it's riches or fame. You give, but to give there needs to be an absence in order to receive. A vacuum draws everything in the magnitude of effect, yet all it is is the absence of those things.

>>10707878

>doubting the Cartesian coordinate model

No moron. I don't "doubt" the existence of a concept. I'm saying that concept doesn't actually explain what takes place in reality. It QUANTIFIES it to use in the LANGUAGE called "math".

>You have literally no reason to not believe those don't work in our universe we have up and down, left and right, forward and back.

You mean other than the fact that we made all those CONCEPTS up? Where is "up" in the universe? "Down"? Ridiculous. It "works" , but under the assumption that there's an actual quantity there.
What is the Cartesian origin/locus of a "field"?

>>10707931
>The medium has mass and is made out of matter.Mass is a property of matter and all mediums are made out of matter.
So there is no difference? Is everything just "matter"? Isn't matter formed?

>The matter which composes the medium is not accurately described by the standard model or Feynman's sea of virtual particles, and is not ruled out by the null result of the Michelson- Morley experiment as many would wrongfully believe.
Well at least you have negated what the matter is not (accurately described) , which is more than what anyone else has done in this thread. (you)'s for you.

>I understand that you are frustrated.
Not at all, you actually made a good post and didn't pretend to know something. You at least know what it is not.

>>10707883

>Why would time have no meaning if its just a change in quality?

What qualities does time posses? It owuld be like saying a "meter" has qualities. A meter of "what", the "what" has the qualities not the measurement of it. If the universe is a change in quality and time has no qualities because it has no properties then I fail to see how time is a factor in the equation to begin with.