/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15501809
Well, Dyson says himself that they describe the physics of everything well. His criticism essentially amounts to clouds and biology?

It's a dumb fuck criticism imo. The effects of land usage are very well known, people have done studies has hasn't looked at and they've found that in general conversion of natural areas to farmland accelerates warming, deforestation accelerates warming, etc. Climate scientists take land use into account, so I don't understand how he has an objection.

The other criticism is clouds. Which the effect that clouds have only increases the error bounds of models. Dyson genuinely has no idea what he's talking about. He should've stuck to theoretical physics.