/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15478986
>and have ejection seats.
Because they're expected to eat a missile at some point, you retard.
Military cargo/awacs planes (which aren't expected to brave missiles) don't have ejection seats.
>And can glide to a safe place
Like orbit or Lisbon for a starship launch from KSC?
Also the ability of helicopters to autorotate, for example, is circumstantial at best.

>>15379993
>NASA is SpaceX

Hey anons I saw this copy pasta in an older /sfg/ and wanted to know what the ones greentexted are/resources on them. Also yes that is your newfag alarm going off, make sure to sleep it just for now

Based
>Plasma magnet sail chads
>NTRchads (who understand the political hurdles that nuclear would have to overcome)
Titan appreciators
Starlink supporters (who understand that it is necessary to fund Mars colonization)
People who mock seething astronomers crying about muh night sky
Massive lunar radio telescope on the dark side of the moon supporters
Lunar centripetal force induced parabolic liquid-mirror telescopes connoisseurs
>FOCALchads who will allow direct imaging exoplanets
Starship militarizers who will attach SAMs and transport ODSTs to any corner of the earth in half an hour
Jovian moon subsurface ocean explorers
Those who acknowledge that ITS had the superior aesthetics and BFR had the superior name
Those who know that while Elon may give an optimistic date at times to inspire his workers and the general public, he will ultimately deliver and is the successor of von Braun
Mars and Titan drone supporters
skylab reminiscers
Inflatable module chads
Centrifugal force gravity orbital station useful to measure the effects of less than 1G but greater than microgravity on the human body constructors
>Starship 1km long tether for artificial gravity chads
Mars independence supporters
Artificial magnetic fields for deployment on surface bases of jovian moons
Mars lava tube settlers

>>15293257