/sci/ - Science & Math

The basic tenets of transgender theory collapse on themselves when taken to their logical conclusions. This is because the entire framework is not grounded in reality and is rather the product of the never ending pursuit of easy wish fulfillment
One of them, for example:
>There is no difference between a trans woman and a "real" woman!!!!1!
If 'trans' and 'cis' are equal and completely the same, why do trans people need to transition? Isn't simply existing enough for them to qualify as a their perceived gender? Because, if they need to transition, that means that they acknowledge that there IS a fundamental difference that must be forcefully erased. And whenever these lunatics try to "transition" they almost always end up looking like sexist caricatures of cisgendered people. Why can't a woman have a beard and a penis? Why can't a man have e cup breasts and a vagina? According to trans theory, both of those are valid, and yet we almost never ever see it for some peculiar reason... except with queers, but that's a different discussion.
There is nothing morally wrong with crossdressing, or acting like the opposite sex. Although it is strange and is usually a red flag for other mental issues, the practice in in of itself is not problematic. The issue arises when these people try to change reality and call you a bigot when you call them out on their BS, and when they prey on confused teenagers to try and sway them to their delusional cult.

>>7734721
How do you figure that math majors aren't autistic????

>>7476058
>fascism
>an economic system

Oh, /sci/!

>>6505302
>we don't know how to do it, so why bother trying

>>6325296