[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12682911 [View]
File: 38 KB, 1092x716, Conceptional model of the earth system operating on timescales of decades to centuries.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12682911

>>12676255
Why does no one acknowledge that resurrection is the most likely answer on two accounts. Religiously, end of time God revives you, scientifically somewhere down the line an intelligent species resurrects you be it by atomic reconstruction or time travel.

>> No.8932876 [View]
File: 38 KB, 1092x716, image.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8932876

>>8932502
Wew.
I was expecting a reply like this but not as stupid.
Here is the part I forgive you for misunderstanding
>nothing will g r o w back
You need to be weary of semantics , sure some individual organisms will survive. High order living systems will not survive with the biodiversty loss of the anthropocene and shifting baselines from anthropogenic disturbance including, but not exclusively climate change. You know land domestication, disruption of phenological nutrient, water, adaptive-renewal cycles, et fucking cetera. Adaptive capacity is non-existent. look at evolutionary history and you will notice it takes atleast 8million years for complex life to begin to e m e r g e again after mass extinctions like this. This isn't just getting warmer this is getting warmer wayyyyyyy faster than that, on top of a pre existing mass extinction. Let me point you to something I perviously mentioned
>Why is it you people are always completely incapable of systems thinking? Not being able to conceptualize what is happening is bad enough. What's worse is you have no idea what you are talking about.
You are taking a complex situation and reducing it to mean global temperature. I'm not fear mongering and you would be very afraid if you had any idea what you are talking about.

>> No.8894353 [View]
File: 38 KB, 1092x716, Conceptional model of the earth system operating on timescales of decades to centuries.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8894353

>>8894133
Then why not create a ship that functions on solely energy? The earth is a pretty useful blueprint for something of that nature if you think about it. If we could replicate the earth's self sustaining mechanics in a vehicle, imagine how far we could go as a species.

>> No.8891369 [View]
File: 38 KB, 1092x716, image.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8891369

>>8891365
Dammit I forget picture again

>> No.8870058 [View]
File: 38 KB, 1092x716, image.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8870058

>>8868800
No, I doubt it. With no ecological systems to produce food, food doesn't happen, there probably won't even be pollinating insects
Remember positive feedback loops
Less resources
More pressure to consume resources
And many more nasty FBL

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]