/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6351226

Are you really resorting to "i can prove that i cant prove something"? That's not the kind of claims that science is after. You are just making a claim about the quality of other claims (meta-claims). It's like I have to spoonfeed you everything.
If you "prove" that something is PROBABLE, what exactly have you said by that? Is it a PROOF for something or merely an estimate/claim of probability? Take your time, I know you have your difficulties with this.

It's hilarious how all you can come up with is basically "no u!"
Anyway, keep up the good work, my friend. I'm out.

>>5786835

Emotions can be understood as a means of evaluating what is happening in our environment. They usually trigger some sort of behavioral response.
Maybe you have noted that among the basic emotions there is only one "positive" emotion: happiness. This makes sense from a evolutionary point of view. If something good happens, you do not need to respond in a specific way.
However, if our responses towards negative events were all the same, it would have dire consequences. That's why there is a greater differentiation in the negative spectrum of emotion.

>>5751021

So you know that there are no studies yet you still come here and ask about the science behind it? Flawless logic.

>>5746529

Impressive.
However, it seems I can't find which book we used at the moment. It's been a while.


Also, >>5746526
Stop feeding it. It will go away.

>>5699654

Fuck you for putting psychology next to art. Fuck. You.

>>5685997

You don't even have to venture outside the realms of wikipedia to see where and why MBTI is flawed.

>>5345386

I see. I misread it as saying "Higher IQ -> Better performance". My point being that we cannot measure IQ above 140 accurately. But since the used SAT-scores my argument because irrelevant.

But might I add: Correlation =/= Causation. Maybe children who perform better at the age of 13 are also children that come from households that can support them in a way that facilitates academic success?
But nontheless an interesting result indeed.

>>5321095

see >>5321059

You don't really know that much about what psychology actually does, do you?