/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4982123
no 747 crashed into any of the wtc towers, a much smaller aircraft did (higher number doesn't always mean bigger plane).

additionally, not even NIST asserts that the structural supports were disabled by the aircraft impacts, because the aluminum crafts were just cut and destroyed by the structural supports, not the other way around.

here's a friendly pic showing what happens when an aluminum craft crashes into a structural support at 500 mph. but then again, you're just relying on what "sounds" reasonable, and not what is reasonable experimentally and observationally, so I doubt you'll even concede this point. or if the pics not enough for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk