/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4320565
Look, man.

You're encroaching on a topic that delves heavily into semantics. It's a lethal combination of both confusion and pointlessness.

Not only is it the stupidest thing to argue about, it's one of the most worthless things to argue about. If people are not able to understand your argument, it's because you haven't formatted it in a way that they can understand and that it's literally offensive to logic.

I ain't saying that you're wrong. But I will say you are acting like a manchild with how you're handling this discussion. So why don't you just chill out for a bit and try convincing people instead of demanding they see things your way?

>>4297672
Not OP, but c'mon.
>Why?
You can't just ask a guy "why", ya know? Answers can only be as good as the questions being asked in the first place. If I asked "why" to someone telling me their computer works, do I mean who fixed it? Do I mean what powers it? Do I mean what makes up the computer? Do I mean what it does?

I mean, fuck. I don't think the OP really knows what he's talking about either, but at least give him questions he can work with so that he at least knows what kind of things to look for.

>>4197508
>those poor bastards out
>those poor bastards
well, that's just, like, your opinion. Man.

>>3719615
yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.