[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.3388434 [View]
File: 43 KB, 400x368, 1310424003365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3388434

Any good book that explain evolution in details with the new discovery we made since Darwin?

Thx /sci/

>> No.3375235 [View]
File: 43 KB, 400x368, duck_alligator_photoshop_funny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3375235

>It is easier to build a house than it is to create life.
Assuming we are discussing constructing a house versus abiogenesis, well... yeah. But this argument assumes the reader has already bought into Intelligent Design. Anybody without prior knowledge or bias, though, I think would immediately think it's easier to create life because the act of sexual reproduction is simpler than the act of building an entire house. This opening statement is flawed.

>The probability of a house created itself out of nothing is zero.
Well... duh. If we're still discussing a finished house.

>Therefore the probability of life creating itself out of nothing is less than that.
...but this relies, again, on the reader already knowing something about Intelligent Design and goes back to the faulty first line of the argument. To a layman, the answer again would be: "wait... sex?"

>Therefore life requires intelligent design."
Not with a crappy first statement like that.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]