/sci/ - Science & Math

what if we just started killing off people with an iq below 100? would it benefit the human race in the long run?

> pic unrelated

>>7679208
I don't think the "smart posters" respond to shit like pic related. It's the inbetween posters, those who aren't completely retard popsci faggots, but who aren't un-baitable well-read science-patrician master race. The problem being, in my opinion, that we don't have enough of this master race to create threads which get good discussion.

I saw a thread the other day about microtubule polarization in neurons, and the people who replied to it were talking about high-school tier action potentials. Action potentials had nothing to do with the microtubules (as far as I am aware), but everyone just wants to add their 2cents and feel good about themselves; even if they are being complete fragile-X syndrome (IQ 40) tier retards

>>7668932
You must be new here.

How it works is thus:

Anon 1 posts something
Anon 2 pretends to be, or actually is, retarded
Anon 3 gets drawn in to the bait, and replies

This is a problem when low quality baits are posted, and get responses, like pic related

>>7664902
Thanks for biting m8 :3