/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12275033
Sounds good.
I always quickly got tired about "tree stuff", which is why I never got into descriptive set theory

>>11998090
I did.

>>11878607
coomooter detected

>>11878517
nice

>>11867278
I'd say
>operators satisfying a Leibniz rule
is already extremely general, no?

I think one could also say something where the Weyl algebra maps into.

>>11707172
>If you're good at them it's pretty much guaranteed you'll be a great research
My age times [math] \int_0^\infty \dfrac{ t }{ {\mathrm e}^{2\pi\, t} -t } {\mathrm d}t [/math] is bigger than one.

>>11707195
Yeah, good.
>Learn about several complex variables
lel, nice.

>Study every single day
How will you deal with the internet. Like, social media and Netflix additions?

>>11707208
I don't really disagree. See above.

My grandfather wrote about about this man.
It's quite fun so far. But taking a glimpse at his Wikipedia article, his short life ending at the time of the French revolution, I have to ask:

Was there anything at all based about this man?