/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12445722
>Nice try, but Falcon 9 actually exists
Enjoy your flight lol

SpaceX loses another Starship prototype in massive explosion.
The failed test comes just a day before SpaceX is set to perform an unrelated launch for NASA that will send two astronauts to the International Space Station. They must be a bit worried.

How do we feel about this private/commercial space trucking business?

>>10923889
oh umm... LOOK! SpaceX had a rocket that exploded that one time! This shows that SpaceX is TOTALLY UNRELIABLE. Imagine if 7 astronauts were on that rocket! They would be DEAD! Knowing SpaceX they would probably load up another rocket with 7 more people on it without addressing what made the last one explode because SpaceX is a GREEDY company and improving their rockets would be too expensive! The only way into space is on guaranteed government money that'll keep coming out to RELIABLE AMERICAN contractors even if they're late so they can continuously improve their work to make NASA rockets safer than ever.

GO SLS!!!