/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14963199

thread, pls no kil

>>14857713

>>14846222
>but have you considered the self interference of the photon
Yes, I have considered a few implications from some imaginable scenarios, but have no idea as to how realistic and accurate they are.

>>14844195
>Gravitational effects on objects are demonstrably independent on their mass hence whether they get deflected or not cannot be used as a test of whether they have mass or not.

>>14821787
Interesting, that might sorta tie into what I was thinking of here: >>14822965

>>14808041
Sir, this is a Mandl-Board.

>>14807392
>Google Image search: Electron Microscope image of atom
Yeah, I feel like the current "Model" is approaching a lot of research the wrong way.
I believe that the "center" of the most basic individual particles are likely to be empty void, with an outer ring/shelled-layer that surrounds the pit.
No good reason for such claim, to me it just makes sense as I elaborated in further detail with the pic from: >>14807351
That's not to completely eliminate the possibility of an aether-like field, but I think trying to drop the obsession with Particles' "Mass"(or lack of Mass) should be replaced with a Model(s) that are more adaptable and representative of reality.

>>14785134
You could have some pretty wild 3d magnetic lattice fields capable of switching on or off or 1/2off on one side, or only susceptible to one specific wavelength, or maybe requires 2 beams simultaneously, left1/2open, right1/2open, top1/2open, bottom1/2open; all kinds of different variables in the and different ways for real-time self-adjusting censors.