/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15836365
>did you read the rest of my post?
No because you're a moron

>>15537057
What you are doing is not abstract thinking but replacing an answer which you don't have with some mystical retardation so you could handwave away having to provide any evidence for your claims, you know, since you don't have any. Do you think dreams are real experiences, too?
Oh and you still haven't answered my question, where's the "soul" or "qualia" of an atom? You do understand that there is functionally no difference between you and an atom, right? So that means atoms should have souls, do atoms go to heaven or hell? >inb4 durr atoms don't experience
Yes they do, when a photon interacts with an electron and pushes it to a higher energy state that's an interaction, so what does the electron experience here, where is its "qualia", what about when atoms are split, where is the "qualia" of the protons and neutrons and all the energy which is used to provide these interactions?

>>15509644
What you are doing is not scientific analysis, you are taking a shitty hypothesis and assuming it must be true because "durr we dun know", even though there is zero evidence to suggest it ever being true, take your (You) and go back to watching scifi flicks, life is far more complicated than "press le button and make le universe XDD", what you suggest is just another shitty replacement for God without answering any questions or providing any evidence for your claim, ergo it can be dismissed without further thought.
>>15509707
>once you know how to simulate all laws
You can't simulate them, at most you can make a pathetic imitation on a computer screen with maybe 0.5% of the complexity of reality, but if you wish to simulate the entirety of reality you would have to know, understand and master absolutely every underlying fundamental force which dictates reality itself, not only that you would have to provide this simulation device with more energy than exists in this reality for every single instant that this reality exists until it ceases to exist, what if you want to simulate the simulation machine inside the simulation machine? You'd have to provide infinite power for infinite simulations, no amount of shitty spaghetti code you use to make textboxes in visual basic will allow you to overcome the fundamental limits of reality and apparently it doesn't help you to think logically, either.