/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15778016
this is why you vett questions and do not give microphone to randoms who seek 30 seconds of fame

>>15115794
I don't get step 4

If one has adhd and CTE are they eligible for long term opioid and stim (if they are the only things that genuinely helps) treatment or nah? I might be more fucked than I initially expected

>>14981355
Can't say the same, I've been like that since forever prior to meds (only started at 20 when I got problem with binge eating) whenever I was required to do anything, follow anything or had a lot of shit going for more than few minutes, hours tops

>>14979138
mmmmm fumes

I came to the conclusion that the end goal of science is where every human is sucked up to some machine where they are flooded with constant dopamine until the universes is destroyed. Is it possible to edit to make it create more dopamine without the dopamine receptors being fried, or is the brain simply to complicated to do such a thing.

Can we make a computer simulation that computes the complete tree of life based on our current cientific knowledge of geology and biology and even using a bit of speculative exo biology to fill the gaps?

>>14635687
I deleted it since having a thread with a currently appropriate theme seemed better than a thread with a random one.
Probably should have checked anniversaries before creating a new thread.

sirs pls
coam
12000 rpm
false sir pls sir stop being #unscientific sir coam is #false
sir the labrat 12000 rpm measuremants sir
rebuttals

>pt has thrombocytopenia (58) and stiffness in the left leg
apparently a hematological case wtf is going on

>>12710142
>They're all the same
Yes, a universe where there's one, randomly generated version of reality is absolutely the same thing as a universe where all possible versions actually exist.

>read more than thousand non novel books (including textbooks)
>can't recall a single one unless something from it is specifically mentioned
>same thing with memories, lectures and pretty much everything
anyone else like this?

is there any reaction with 0 enthalpy?

>a tensor is an algebraic object that describes a relationship between sets of algebraic objects related to a vector space. Objects that tensors may map between include vectors and scalars, and even other tensors.
what does this even mean? who the fuck comes up with this cryptic shit?

Shit I just realized I need simply 12 matrix of 10 elements.

Let's say I have the following:

>Game weapon
>Types of weapon
>Ammo cardtridge
>Ammo elements type
>Darkness Light shield
>Ammo Trail
>Type of armour
>Shield resistance stamina

Let's say these elements are designed in RPS groups.

How many elements each one should have to have at least a million possible combinations, or a billion, or 10 billion combinations?

>>12116858

I said three but gave four lines. LOL stupid me.

I'm taking the WAIS-IV bros.
Is there anyway to prepare so that I don't eradicate my ego?

based Tomcat edition, shame it didn’t have any success with the Phoenixes, at least in burger service
That aside, I’m a brainlet in first year physics struggling with special relativity. I managed to fraud a lot before just by visualizing, but it kinda breaks down now. So far, there are two basic questions I don’t understand.
The first one is about proper time. In class, they said proper time tau squared was t^2-x^2 (I guess setting c to 1), which is a hyperbola. They said that this was similar to say concentric distance circles from the origin in the xy plane. Unfortunately, my brain can only draw rough analogies to easier classical concepts, but it makes sense visually given the Minkowski diagrams are kinda bounded by the asymptotes of the hyperbolas. Then in order to get to the momentum four vector, they took a derivative with respect to proper time. Now the algebra and the chain rule makes sense, but what does it mean to take a derivative with respect to the hyperbolas? I’m just unable to visualize things anymore. I kinda just accepted it and went on, but it still bugs me. I feel like getting this will also help explain the energy momentum invariant thing, since that also involves something squared minus something squared.
The second one is about electric fields in different frames. In class, they said that E fields parallel to motion remain the same while those perpendicular to motion get scaled by gamma. They explained this using parallel plates of uniform charge, which makes sense because of length contraction. But I don’t see how this generalizes to all E fields from all charge distributions. How can I be sure that it isn’t just a transformation of the space and the charge distribution that then changes the E field? How (and why?) would this apply to say a point charge?
Thanks for putting up with my dumbass lmao

Fuck guys my finger is stuck in my belly button
WTF do I do?

/vg/ here (agdg).

What math do I need to study to know how to code a basic shader that draws some spirograph shape and know what equations I need to make a shape I have in my mind?

scientifically speaking, is it better to be smart but lazy or dumb but industrious from an evolutionary purpose point of view?

Are humanities science?

Like wtf is literature and history?

How come animals feed of plants poo and plants feed of animals poo? (by poo I mean pee, poo, breathing waste).