/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3848335
You see this is the problem with your mindset, you think that because IBM couldn't run a bakery much better than a regular baker this means a baker could run IBM, in reality he wouldn't even be able to get an entry level position. This is why you think the stock market is full of shit, it's like the dunning kruger effect or whatever.

Education and technology is the only way to emancipate the poor and downtrodden, so just let corporations do whatever the fuck they want.

>durr hurr capitalism is evil im so edgy hipster
So what if he made a stupid error, everyone does, you probably think keynesian economics works and that a socialist utopia would be desirable.

>>3547988
>>3547994
Haitis ills seem to be more to do with statists than capitalists, somehow I think a group of people who control the use of force, coercion and violence are more capable of oppressing a country than someone using finance to bring resources and people together to provide high quality goods and services.

In fact I'm pretty sure Haiti could use more people using finance to bring resources and people together to provide high quality goods and services right about now.

An economy has limited resources, if you start breaking windows the economy has to divert resources towards window production and installation, the rich are poorer but everyone else is a little poorer as well, even the glaziers are poorer in the long term because the new demand for windows will attract more people to the trade and due to competition their income will return to the average of the now poorer economy.

Maybe not all good but not all bad either, so fuck lefty leftist socialist hipsters.

>>3304648
True, if people are too stupid to understand the service sector they will vote in a socialist government, destroy capitalism, destroy the middle class and return to medieval socio-economic conditions where a ruling class and their thugs and clergy oppress/fool 95% of the population.

>>2800184
>>2800199
Ok but I will die eventually anyway so instead I will conduct scientific research to discover sectors of the economy that are undervalued and invest in them speeding up the development of the cure for cancer and other diseases, developing poor countries into prosperous 1st world countries and advancing technology, with the profits I will of course enjoy a moderate standard of living typical for an upper-middle class like a surgeon or a university professor because most of my wealth is tied up in stock anyway, yes I will be richer than other people but I don't see why the entire world's burdens should be placed on my shoulders, I will leave that wealth to charity after I die anyway.

Problem?

A wheel with no resistance doesn't slow down when spinned, well I never.

A socio-economic theory composed of perfect human beings who are the epitome of moral righteousness doesn't have any problems whatsoever, well I never.

You must be a super-smart genius extraordinaire, sir. I'm still going to exploit the proletariat though because I enjoy living in opulent splendor and believe I am superior to them and deserve to, so, yeah..

I find it hilarious how the communists (you heard me, communists) have been able to turn manual laborers against intellectual laborers, by somehow making workers jealous of the middle class who succeed by working smart while kneeling down and worshipping statist crony-socialist corporatists like George Soros who succeed through corruption opened up by state interventionism.

This shit needs to stop. The worlds' industrial might could give everyone a middle class, first world living standard if most of the profit wasn't taxed and regulated into the bank accounts of the super-rich.

Do you really think you will break into the ranks of the worlds' statists? By helping to persecute the middle class?

The worlds' most oppressed workers, in socialist planned economies, have a miserable, squalid existence to show for it, even when they have the vote.

However, in a free market you have the most direct system of representation on economic matters, individual freedom, this way everyone can own a piece of the pie, true "collective ownership of the means of production", not some corrupt bureaucracy calling itself a "people's republic". Instead of everyone being impoverished proletariats serving the politburo as the communists dream, everyone can be petite bourgeois, both owning and working as free individuals making their own decisions.

Most things aren't that simple OP. Stay away from ideology, especially ones that dictatorships have been using to indoctrinate the masses with for nearly a century.

>The more work you input into society, the more goods you are entitled to gain in the community
So you wouldn't get rid of money, you're replace it with "labor credits" or something.