/sci/ - Science & Math

Why does Physics attract the greatest number of pseuds?

>>10626511
how does this work??

>>10549448

Sorry for the small brain question, but why is there no formula for the product of two angles? [sin(a*b)=?] Is it because it cannot exist, no one has found it yet, or just that it's so useless and long and obtuse and whatnot that no one cares to have it written somewhere on the internet?

>>9930122
>>The universe is understandable and the man succeeded, without instructions, to understand it
I never thought about this before, it does seem to be truly remarkable now that I think about it. A whole myriad of philosophical implications just from this one thought.
Obviously the obtuse will want to point out that we can't understand the universe "fully" yet. But that misses the point. We do understand a lot, and it's not kiddy stuff, very sophisticated science. And the fact that we can do this, regardless of whether or not we need advanced computers to command this knowledge, is interesting.

>>9062356
Got any non-wikipedia sources on this so i can expand my tiny as fuck brainmass around this topic? Math heavy if possible, i am tired of qualitative shit that always says: "here we omitted the tedious proofs"

>>8858198

>>7758892
We're talking about possibly hundreds of millions of high velocity fragments of metal swarming the Earth's orbit.
It could take decades and require multiple laser sites to be constructed to throw the objects into an unstable orbit and even when it is finally deemed reasonably safe, we will still be at risk sending objects up.

Something needs to be done early.