/sci/ - Science & Math

OP here!

I don't want to insist on how correct I am. And, when bias is established, there's no way you can take me seriously.
Even though I tried to make the ideas simple, it might still take a while before you can digest them. You don't have to go through that. You can simply satisfy your herd mentality with ad hominem if you'd wish to. If reading my article makes you feel better about yourself, then that's at least some contribution. I'm not saying this in a negative way.

I'm going to revise the article so that it doesn't look like I'm talking about something I don't understand. And don't call me delusional! I'm well aware that oftentimes humans' satisfactions can be misleading. To quote my writing
"Tiny pieces of chaotic thoughts initiate a disproportionate amount of satisfaction, in which case there is likely to be no real justification. "
After all, how can the brain tell whether something is truly a success or just wishful thinking?

Anyway, R.I.P my two months. I still believe my model is world-saving; you'll understand it after you learn to make sense of your consciousness (perceptible stimulations) with the ideas of neural networks and co-activation.

...
Nevermind, of course you won't. Have a happy life.