[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16149865 [View]
File: 80 KB, 584x845, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16149865

>>16149553
those crossed over after unblinding werent counted so yes, the control group was bigger.
>During the blinded, placebo-controlled period, 15 participants in the BNT162b2 group and 14 in the placebo group died; during the open-label period, 3 participants in the BNT162b2 group and 2 in the original placebo group who received BNT162b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered to be related to BNT162b2 by the investigators. Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups (Table S4).

I hope you understand this means that 5 more vaxxed participants died bringing the total to 20 compared to 14 of the unvaxxed.
>and the main take away of the article you provided is that the vaccine is considered both safe and efficient
kek .you ignore the evidence and jump straight to 'what did they say in the conclusion for retards that didnt read' section. You hate the objective statistics and keep pushing subjective classifications on the death by scientists with conflict of interests on the paper. No 'vaccine' in the history of humanity has level 1 evidence of harm PROVEN like this.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]