/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6194142
>genetic diversity

We're not talking making a couple of people the basis for the rest of humanity. We're talking about limiting the ability of undesirable traits from propagating in the future.

>>5107977
>"Do a google search on bing"
I love you Ken.

It's a deep seeded psychological retaliation against the US defeating them in WWII. Obviously go against the cultural norm of American sexuality.

mfw I'm typing this.

>economics

anyone? no? I didn't think so.

You don't hate the word random, you hate the ideology behind it.

>mfw otherwise OP would be a weirdo who hates linguistics for no reason

>mfw this list

>but good luck maintaining that amount of dick sucking without bending to the adrenaline and the natural compulsion to "suck back" Your customers.

>>2239687
You've obviously never been in a relationship. Females carve that lovey dovey foreplay.

Also, if you try to leave a female right after she has serviced your cock with a blowjob... don't expect for her to answer her phone for the next few days.

>>2148307
>FOLIAGE EMBRACERS

>>1992883

>never studied things like Economic growth models.

"e" shits over everything, bro.
π is less shit tier than ϕ, though.

Stole the ending from someone else here, but I'm glad at how well it went.


Welcome to Mormon.org chat.
A representative will be with you shortly.
Agent [Keven] is ready to assist you.
Me: Hello, I'm Dan
Me: I have two quick questions if you have the time.
Keven: sure
Keven: go ahead
Me: Well, firstly, I was wondering what the exact theology behind the sin of "adultery" really is.
Me: Particularly in it's forbidding of homosexuality.
Me: Is it forbidding homosexuality because homosexual intercourse would need to be a sin because it's not between a married man and woman?
Keven: Well, adultery is having sexual relations outside of marriage, whereas fornication is having sexual intercourse before marriage, so are you referring to fornication?
Me: I suppose.
Me: I was under the impression that the homosexual fornication and relationship was sin because it's not allowed in the confines of marriage. Is that right?
Keven: Honestly, even if two homosexuals were legally married, it still wouldn't be right in the eyes of God
Me: Why exactly is that?
Me: The only sin applicable seems to be 'Thou shalt not commit adultery,' but wouldn't a legally bound marriage, homosexual or otherwise, make that null?
Keven: It goes against a very important commandment from God to "multiply and replenish the earth"

>my face when people think being gay isn't both genetic and environment

>>1263049
>>1265011
Absolute 0, niggers do you know about it?

>>1240351
Lol 0/10

>>1104577
You just keep telling yourself that, bro

LOL OP YOU TELL 'EM XD EPIC WIN