/sci/ - Science & Math

Should I always opt for the rigorous, proof based perspective on a subject? Or should I first get a simplified source to get a general idea of the material

nice courage anon.
well even though you might be bullshitting me and no point in proving if you are or aren't, but it have made me reflect on my insecurities. like how I call people retards because I don't know how to interact with people.
I apologize for calling you a smooth brain faggot tard earlier. wether you too offense or not.
(It is impossible for me to be sincere but I know people are supposed to say sorry when someone does something mean)
anyways have fun dude.
https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~abhishek/chicmath.htm#e:calculus

>>10713509
it also separates multiplication and addition.
I didn't make it.

>>10692237

>>10674911
checked
that's a meme chart you fucking dumbass.
here's what you want
>Arithmetic
Stoddard's Speed Mathematics Simplified
>Highschool Mathematics
Gelfand's books, supplement with Lang's basic mathematics or Axler's precalculus if you want, could also supplement with Khan Academy, or all 3.
>Calculus part 1
Spivak or Courant or Apostol. You can try Stewart if you're having a really hard time. Apostol is considered to be the best but you would NEED to buy his books physically, the pdfs on the internet are all corrupted, trust me.
>Calculus part 2
Continue with Courant/Apostol

That's how you start.

is this list a meme?

>>10629585
chalk if you're poor

>>10629549
pic

>>10495547

>>10327410

>>10311784
Khan academy is the laziest and free approach. takes more time but less effort. Otherwise, Lang's Basic mathematics or Gelfand's books do the job

inb4 high school to specialist spammer posts

>>10123197

>>10097475
Optimized.