/sci/ - Science & Math

What part of math is the most exemplified description of sex as an equation?

>>5713303
Muh arrogance in the fact that science actually gives answers instead of just dicking around with people who dont understand what their being beaten over their head with

>>5652923
sorrryyyy /sci/ shes such a babe rite

ffs...

>>5543763
>Doesnt matter. Relationships with the subject matter arent important to having knowledge of the subject matter.
You are using those relationships to describe the knowledge
>next point

>No. Its not clear at all.
X is the direction towards the term, the way you 'know' what you are going to say before you say it- as is the intention, and the point of that being that the 'knowledge' is noted before it is even said(there are many subsets of X, as noted in my previous post)
Y is the notation of or after giving specificy to the knowledge, it is an approximation.
Where the knowledge in question is the R, to use your standard, that is being derived from the x()y
When we say "it multiplies" by giving the notation- or lack of- we are contructing an (Intended Term)X and (Relational Note)Y as a Y(number)X XY YX
That is as numbers
As Words you are doing a X(word)Y Y/X (XY)
Where Y/X is is the denominator, or how many times Y goes into X, and X being the sum of your point, just going as far to say of what is a complete denomination by the approximation of the notations you're utilizing.

I could say 4 words in latin of what would take me 20 wholes in chinese, and viceversa for some occasions, it is a matter of what we have been taught to understand of an adequate representational in what we speak.

I'm not really sure if I can put it any clearer than all that.
& Go ahead and write your paper on that