/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8493208
There is so much over-simplistic bullshit in this post I will have to break it down

>Invest in nuclear energy, invest in researching alternative nuclear fuels like Thorium.

This should have always been the plan, thanks leftwing ecofags!

>Reduce worldwide population in developing countries, Africa, etc.

Do you propose the gas chamber? Weaponized smallpox? Nuclear warheads, maybe?

>Invest in renewables like hydroelectric, wind in areas where it is effective, concentrated solar plants in deserts, and solar panels in cities and towns to supplement (won't be able to completely provide energy needs) the demand for energy.

The vast majority of renewables are HORRIBLY inefficient, and require government subsidies to run. In many cases, throwing up wind farms or solar power plants actually cause net decreases in power generation because the local coal power plants have to vary their output throughout the day in response to changing weather conditions, causing inefficiencies.

>Focus on sustainable agriculture by giving subsidies to local, sustainable farms, not massive agriculture conglomerates.

"Local sustainable farms" are far less efficient than agribusiness, and in many cases are no more cleaner. There is no real definition of "sustainable local farm" anyway, you are throwing money at nothing for feels.

>Reduce consumption of beef and other animal products

How? Carbon taxes on steak? Do you really want to make a black market for fucking steak, of all things?

>Stop letting the fossil fuel industry have such massive lobbying and political power.

You want to stripe private citizens of the right to political representation because you disagree with them?