/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10689524
>no one became rich for inventing those methods.
Yeah but what if there was a $1M prize for inventing a method like that? Could you collect a $1M prize for inventing a method like that, in the special case where there is $1M prize advertised?

Say there was a time limit on the prize that said you had to wait 24 months for flaws in your method to be exposed, and it has been 27 months with no flaws exposed and only further confirmations which are like concrete except firmer and more solid. Could you collect the $1M or is getting paid a fuck-you amount of money a meme and they will only let you get money by flicking nickels at you for being their wageslave, or maybe if you grovel to your mom who also is trying to make sure you never get the $1M and got you fired from your last few jobs?

Say you somehow collected the $1M prize, do you think you could use your five minutes of fame to get at least one person to buy your book? What if instead of some stupid machine learning algorithm, you solved something called "the most important unsolved problem in mathematics?" Do you think you could get one or more persons to buy your book?

>27 is a bigger number than 24
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1703.0073

>>10555035
Infinity is usually afforded with some freedom to do the algebraic operations in any order one wishes or at any time one wishes. The hat is instruction for how to use that freedom.

I explain it here: where other pic is from:
>Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

Pic related, this is how I disproved RH in 2017