/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10264307
T. Peter watts

>>8377105
>Blacks have only recently (1960-70s) received an acceptable level of equality
housing discrimination only ending a couple decades ago.

>>8377181
>>8377244
you should know that here in the uk you can still identify more lawyers, politicians, bankers, oxbridge graduates etc with particular surnames which were elite in the 1100's.
(http://www.livescience.com/48951-surnames-social-mobility.html.. horrible site but tldr: social elitism can last 20 to 30 generations, 600-900 years).

>>8377195
x is a feedback loop is when x is its own cause (and hence its own effect). poverty causes further poverty, hence is a feedback loop. crime is also a feedback loop.

>>8377202
before colonisation there were large black nations as technologically advanced as european/asian at the time. they were not - it would be fair to say - as culturally advanced.

it should be noted as well that IQ test scores have increased significantly amongst white people since the test's creation (numerous reasons). blacks have not increased so much. if we extrapolate back to pre-colonialism they would have been roughly the same.

>>8377267
black people are more likely to be imprisioned for are non-violent crimes - i.e. drug posession. it has since been admitted by leading figures in the nixon administration that the war on drugs was the imprison both anti-war hippies and civil-rights blacks. documents show the DEA and police departments being instructed not the arrest white people for drug possession.


The problem with race is whilst it could be a well used scientific concept it is completely misunderstood by retards like >>8377300 who say shit like
>The only three races are Caucasian, Mongolian, and Negroid.
east africans are less related to west africans than celts are to north indians. also you have entirely forgotten aboriginal Australians, you muppet.

RIP

Help me /sci/, how do I break my addiction to fapping?

>>6899555
I think you're on to something