/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14567007
>>14567151
>>14567158
The list has been updated

Changes to A-tier:
Marie Curie - can't in good faith say she is a worse experimentalist than Faraday.
Richard Feynmann - Apparently he isn't on the level of S-tier given the fact of overwhelming disapproval for him being there.
Cauchy - His work done in mathematics is just as important as some of the physicists work above in their fields.
Turing - He essentially discovered an entire field.

Changes to B-tier
Kepler - You are correct Kepler was a great discoverer for orbital mechanics but he did nothing much other than that, which would put edge him at the same level as Galileo.
Galois - He is a pillar stone similar to Kepler perhaps if lived a bit longer would be S-tier and made many more contributions.
De Broglie - Pillar stone of quantum mechanics similar to both Kepler and Galois being Pillars of their respective fields. But isn't the guy who discovered or synthesized an entire field like the guys above him.

Changes to D-tier
Ramanujin - I really only put him in C because so many Indians praise this man like he is the second coming of Jesus.

Thinking about moving Plank and Heisenberg down a tier according to these standards and Nikola Tesla has been taken off of the list. If you want me explain some of the one's I disagree with you on I can but I can't do all at once there is too many.
>>14567274
These people are all great but they have no name recognition and yes I am a proud undergrad. I won't be including any obscure physicists either.