/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15734334
>It’s this crazy thing where maybe there’s a nuclear war on Earth and so the people on Mars are there and they’ll come back down and, you know, be alive after we all kill each other.”
Musk really is a gigantic baboon. For somebody claiming to be engineering minded he is blissfully oblivious to how impotent NOOKS are in creating extinction events. /k/ had a whole topic recently where ziggers were trying to bash the nook-ook drums again in their monkey rage. Ended them getting completely clubbered into the ground with anons in know paining a pretty hilarious picture how there is nearly not enough carriers or functional warheads to cause anything resembling an apocalypse. This is if you ignore obvious issues like out of control corruption already eating into the miniscule arsenals of dictatorships like puccia. Even at the height of the 80s the total destructive yield of all nook-ooks combined was piss weak compared to the most recent (and softest) extinction event, the Chicxulub impact 65 million years ago.

Nooks will kill somewhere between 300-500 million (inc famine), level cities here and there and...thats it. Radiation is negligible in the long run

>>15435309
in case the ukraine war has completely passed you anonymous sites like 4chan or really any internet comment sections (like reddit) are a grooming ground for state funded, dedicated propaganda branches specifically meant to spew their shit out on the semi-open western net. While keeping domestic info spheres tightly locked down with censors and language barriers

russians (vatniks) and chinese (wumaos) are at the forefront of these kind of subversive shit