/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8973578
> (don't want to expose but it ended with -er?)
Probably forgot I said it then.
> (that was for master's, says 2015 in the pic)
I thought you were still an undergrad for some reason lmao.

>>8957132
>So even if you manage to write down some action that seems right, which in itself is probably hard, you will still be left with the issue of defining the path integral.
I don't care. I just want a TQFT that does what AdS/CFT does. The details can be worked out later.
There are a lot of additional structures such as links, [math]H^1[/math] Lagrangian subspaces and integers that have been appended to the space structures of TQFTs, I don't see anything that'd stop me from doing the same with sigma fields.
Besides, I don't need to have a NSM at the end. It's just an analogy.