/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10327689
>The last time the climate changed rapidly was the Krakatoa eruption

>>10096696
>Maybe later I'll get you some data
read as:
>I don't have any evidence but I wanna pretend like I do

>glutamate, formaldehyde, or whatever else
glutamate is an ubiquitous amino acid in eukaryotes, you retard. your body contains about a pound of it in your proteins. claiming that a gram or two of glutamate from a vaccine could ever plausibly cause health problems shows how thoroughly ignorant you are.
and like I said in >>10096450 your body naturally makes more formaldehyde in an hour than you'd get from a vaccine.

aluminum adjuvants are at least a plausible issue, but they've been extensively studied, and it turns out they're pretty damn safe.
>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00406/full

>>9975135
>The study supports my claim fully. It's why I even linked it in the first place.
okay you brainlet, let me explain it in detail.

greater cognitive ability (or at least the proxy of educational skill) correlates with greater age at first reproduction, reducing the total number of offspring produced. however, it also provides a foraging advantage, allowing for offspring to be better-fed, improving offspring survival rates and conferring an overall selective advantage. however, in modern society, offspring survival rates are nearly 100% anyway, so that advantage goes away.

the metric of fitness is not how many offspring you produce, but how many offspring survive to reproductive age.

it is explicitly stated in the discussion section that educational ability must have been selected for in the past (such as by the mechanism above), or it could not have reached that level in modern humans.

your inability to understand this doesn't make it less true.

>I am familiar with this stuff. It's entirely speculative.
that's where you're wrong, kiddo. it's been subjected to predictive tests. see the first graf in >>9975048

>see temperature station in a suboptimal location
>it always reads 2 C above the "actual" temperature for the area
>HURR THAT WARMING TREND IS THE RESULT OF POOR SITING
imagine being this retarded