/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3537239
Or maybe I just acknowledge that it's one of those unknowable things we'll probably argue over forever?
I've said this over and over again, I'll find out when I die. Until then it's up in the air and probably always will be.

>>3537233
I don't pretend to know what god is or what he does. I think if he does have some effect on the universe it's probably not something we can put in a microscope or poke with a needle.

>>3537222
>You said it's unknowable. It isn't.
>mfw
>It means that any god purported to be the creator of the universe isn't real. No god can fit that criteron now that it is known to be a natural phenomenon, just like the god of thunder cannot exist because we know thunder is natural
"Looking for the sky by looking at the ground".
Seeing the watch doesn't mean the watchmaker doesn't exist.
That's a shitty analogy but you get the point.
>How do you know that's true? What prevents the existence of a comprehensible god?
I don't know what's true. Have you even been reading the things I type?