/sci/ - Science & Math

also, i might be a bit slow to respond to this thread, im currently busy on the 4 colour drawing thread (you must have seen it, its been alive for about 30 hours...or would have been, but for the 150 picture limit, so it has been reborn...)
>>1979651
yeh, i think i read somewhere that origionally, sex cells were about the same size, and then 1 started to enlarge, and 1 started to decrease in size but increase in number...and there was a good reasonm for it...and it evolutionarily accelerated...erm, i can't quite remember how it goes...it had a diagram and everything.

>>1969569
>because for me god is something physical.
>for me

either god is objectively real, or he is just in your imagination. the latter is correct.

>>1959800
well this might be a little dishonest, and i usually don't suggest this kind of thing, but you can always play the agnostic card.
you just say "you're not really sure what to believe, and arn't making a decision either way" and that there is "probably some sort of higher power out there..."
etc.
i bet she's date an agnostic, its just that atheists tend to have a bad rep, except with other people who are also atheists. (i am atheist btw)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution
>In chemistry, a solution is a homogeneous mixture composed of two or more substances. In such a mixture, a solute is dissolved in another substance, known as a solvent.

"solvent" it is then. :)

>The acceleration of an object in free fall is 10m/s.
...there is no fucking way you are a teacher. first of all, acceleration is in ms-2, and secondly, acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 ms-2 (to 3 significant figures)

>>1949253
its making use of geothermal energy and hydroelectric energy. its not troll physics, this works and is used. (although individually, not at the same time.)

>>1940867
yeh murdering members of the 'outgroup' is not morally difficult at all, humans used to live in clans and tribes in the past, and wage war on one another. But we have a strong moral sense not to murder people we know, people we live amongst, or people who are related to us, for evolutionary reasons.
>There are plenty of skills in which being good at math doesn't determine success.
but being good at maths doesn't detract from this other ability, yes? you might be able to do the other task perfectly well also,

>>1935179

>my god this thread is full of retards.

fuck you

>projectory

what? i think you mean 'trajectory' or maybe you were crossing it with the word 'projectile...
who's the retard now?

what out for trajectiles on you're way out.