/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4243746
Seriously, just stop saying words. This is the science board. This is where we are supposed to talk about science.

>>3819417

>>3767499

>C#

>>3744036

>>3633606

>>3625573
why are you even on this board

>>3581011
>viable offspring
> a horse and a donkey.
I think you should read what you post before you post it.

>>3444353
>Dawkins society
ISHYGDDT

The chances of picking the same friends are lower because you would have to pick the <span class="math">same[/spoiler] friends. That lowers the chances from 1/x to 1/x * 1/X. The chances are higher to meet them in the first place. Similarly, with the lottery, you would have to pick the same numbers as the winning numbers are. It doesn't matter shit if you actively pick those or not.

>>3331903
> momentum/mass ratio

>>3324877

>>3294201
>Just because in the picture the circles for 1, 2 and 3 are large enough to fit in more than a single line through it does not mean your way works.
try harder, faggot

>>3283119

>>3268093
>Don't be pessimistic. We could be the first generation to live for ever. Or until were 500.
This is not going to happen within our lifetime, or the next generation's lifetime.

>>3261647
It's an emergent property, not a computational end-point. It's what allows us to reflect on- and react to what is going on. It's a huge adaptive advantage.

>>3255176
>your entire body though.
>I agree each individual cell would need a certain amount.

>but over your whole body you need to fill each cell up and that is very scale like
See attached.

>fluoride is not useful at all
>and actually does damage with each atom
>1 atom does damage.
Like what? Humor me. What does it do? Do you even know ANYTHING about the physiology involved?

>>3245767
>I hate taking medicine, it's against my personal ethos

>>2192118
If you're not a troll you're the biggest fucking idiot I've ever seen on this board. You just fucking argued that gene flow between populations is not beneficial for genetic diversity. Seriously, take some fucking high school biology.

>>2058882
Yes I fucking can argue that because the validity of the statement depends on the definition of the construct in question you fucking moron.

Anyway, lets stick to climate change. There was no need for this retarded metaphor. As this anon [>>2058877] mentioned, it's irrelevant what you believe. It's science.

>>1954907
newfag

>>1904793
fucking newfags

>>1890228
>It does not necessarily mean to demonstrate, beyond doubt, that something is true.
>definitively prove
>definitively

>>1646313
why didn't you read the link in the OP?

>this thread